The comptroller's office has audited the New York City Transit's efforts to implement the 17 recommendations made in a previous audit. There are follow-up audits of City operations as a means of increasing accountability
and ensuring that City resources are used effectively, efficiently, and in the best interest of the public.
This letter report is to provide the results of the audit regarding Accenture LLP's billing practices for the Access NYC Program contract. The Access NYC Program provides New York City's residents with online
access to City, State, and Federal human services benefit programs. The objective was to determine whether the expenditures for the Access NYC Program contract were reasonable and justified.
In accordance with the requirements of the New York State Municipal Assistance Corporation Act and the New York State Financial Emergency Act, the City of New York is required to submit monthly financial reports. This is the financial report for July 2013, detailing financial plan statements, revenue activity, capital commitments, and capital cash flow.
This Independent Budget Office (IBO) fiscal brief addresses the decreased revenue from City athletic facilities after a fee increase was implemented for their use. Included are data and analyses of the spending trends following the fee increase in various City athletic facilities.
Audit Report on the Cemusa NY LLC's Payment of Franchise Fees in Compliance with Its Coordinated Street Furniture Franchise Agreement with the Department of Transportation MJ12-127A
This report details the fiscal impacts of the legalization of marijuana on New York City. It was found that the City will benefit from the legalization of marijuana if the production and sale of it was regulated and taxed.
An audit report was filed on August 22, 2013 on the health and safety conditions of Department of Parks and Recreation's (DPR) public swimming pools. It was determined that DPR's controls to ensure that pools are consistently maintained in a safe manner need improvement. There was limited evidence that inspections were performed as required and that all deficient conditions were corrected. DPR also did not appear to be consistently addressing issues identified by the Department of Health and Mental Hygiene, or adhering to the City Health Code. Recommendations were made to rectify these issues.